Flux routes the approvals a finance team already runs and keeps the trail. The wedge is cycle time you can measure and a trail nobody has to reconstruct. Tap any circle for the talking point.
| Differentiator | Fluxapproval workflow | Spreadsheets + emailthe status quo | NetLedger approvalsERP module | Halyard Approvalsworkflow SaaS | Ridgeway Workflowenterprise BPM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Routing that matches the real process Hero
Including the exceptions and who covers an absence.
|
|||||
|
Cycle time you can measure Hero
Per step, in days, without anyone assembling it.
|
|||||
|
Trail without reconstruction
Why an exception was approved, eight months on.
|
|||||
|
Adoption without training
An approver who never logs in still approves.
|
|||||
|
Works with more than one system
The approved record lands where it has to land.
|
|||||
|
Policy and delegation control
Thresholds, backups, and who may act for whom.
|
|||||
|
Time to live
From decision to the first real request routed.
|
|||||
|
Already paid for
What the finance team has already committed to.
|
The status quo, and NetLedger's module when someone senior asks why we are paying twice. Halyard shows up in about one deal in five, Ridgeway only when there is a mandate from above the finance team.
The sheet works at low volume. The ERP module is already paid for. Conceding both, out loud, keeps the champion on our side; arguing them makes them defend the thing we want them to leave.
One question, asked early: for the last request that went badly, how many days were waiting versus doing, and who could answer that without reading a mailbox. Everything on this page follows from the answer.